X25-M G2 80gb RAID 0 LOW RESULT ?? WHY ??

[idata]

Hi....here are my results....HD TACH and HD TUNE should be a lot higher. ATTO from .5 to 16 are too low...

To see what the result should be here is a good review with the results. http://hothardware.com/Articles/Fusionio-vs-Intel-X25M-SSD-RAID-Grudge-Match/?page=4 http://hothardware.com/Articles/Fusionio-vs-Intel-X25M-SSD-RAID-Grudge-Match/?page=4

Using the same controller as me ICH10R SB Sata controller.

My OS is Windows 64bits. Core I7 920 and Aus P6T deluxe mb.

Any suggestions ???

Hi.

[idata]

Thank you !! I will left you with an appetizer ... I want 2 of them 🙂

http://www.micron.com/about/news/pressrelease.aspx?id=2A5EB2EDEFA2B68E http://www.micron.com/about/news/pressrelease.aspx?id=2A5EB2EDEFA2B68E

a read throughput speed of up to 355MB/s and a write throughput speed of up to 215MB/s

Just imagine in RAID 0 !!

[idata]

Dag! SATA 6 - wonder how much those babies will cost - impressive.

For now I am a happy camper. I do a lot of Photoshop work with thousands of 12MB RAW files. So here is my real works (if unscientific) test on my i920 3.8 GHz rig:

Photoshop CS4 64-bit opened fresh in about 2 seconds. I then opened over 200 12MP full size RAW files (D300) which opened in the ACR dialog in about 2.5 seconds. Now the real test - 16-bit RAW conversion: When opening all 100 RAW NEFs (about 16MB each) from ACR to CS4 in 16-bit into CS4 edit mode (the actual RAW conversion), all 100 files were opened in 2 min 30 sec. It used 6.84GB of RAM and I could see all 8 threads evenly busy across all 4 CPU core.

Another test, those 100 RAW files amount to 1.5GB total; a straight folder copy took between 1.2 and 1.5 seconds.

Not bad.

Regards,

Mike

[idata]

HDTune and HDTach will not measure Sequential Read correctly unless Volume WriteBack Cache is turned on, and since this setting is best left off, disregard those apps when measuring sequential speeds. Real world Seq. speeds are very close to ATTO and CDM, so then you know what to use...