This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
cluster size other that 4KB on Intel SSD
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-11-2010 07:31 AM
<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:16.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} -->
Most program and data files are much larger than they were when 4KB became the default value for cluster size.
I would like to know whether there is any inconvenience (other than wasting some space) in having 64KB clusters.
And what performance improvements could I expect while loading today's programs and data files.
The information found on the Internet is rather conflicting.
But Intel certainly has solid measured results.
10 REPLIES 10
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2010 09:09 AM
Goggle Paragon Tech. and see what they have to say , while you are there check out the Alignment tool .
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2010 10:06 AM
Sorry, but can't you be any more precise with your reference?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2010 12:27 PM
Read post by James Walker about PAT
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2010 12:15 AM
I read the post about PAT.
Alignment seems to be important for SSD performance, so I will use PAT if someone can provide it (the free offer does not exist any more).
BTW, I have tried to do the right thing by using the align= parameter in diskpart.
But my original question about cluster size other than 4KB is still unanswered.
Related Content
