09-10-2010 12:34 PM
Hey all, I was using Toolbox 1.3 without issues. I had the VSS warning but could always go ahaid and trim with 1.3.
Now after installing the new Toolbox 2.0, I have an error message "" and I cannot TRIM anymore, please help!
The system is XP SP3 32 bit, the Volume Shadow Copy (VSS service), is set to manual & is running.
There is no "backup in progress". Also, System Restore is *disabled* in XP control panel (I have no use for this feature).
Please help!
Thank you,
TSR
09-10-2010 04:30 PM
ZXTT, I see your point.
But well, SSD Toolbox 1.3 allowed at least "MS Software Shadow Copy Provider" to be completely disabled with no side effects, why not 2.0?
Another small rant, totally unrelated: It's a shame Intel wrote the SSD Toolbox based on .NET ;(
On XP, I had to install 350+ megs (.NET 2.0) _solely_ to be able to run the Intel Toolbox.
All that wasted disk space is sad (especially on SSD!) 😕
08-07-2011 04:51 AM
Thank you shadowRunner, this helped me to get rid of the message:
"Intel SSD optimizer could not run due to the presence of Volume Shadow Copy Service data. Likely cause is a backup in progress."
To make SSD Toolbox v2.0 run on XP (SP3 32bits english version) I had to make the following services running:
windows management instrumentation
com+ event system
ms software shadow copy provider volume shadow copy(.NET 2.0 was already installed, and the "system restore service" is disabled)
Now it works.
Ebeis.
08-07-2011 07:25 AM
I have a few things to say about this:
1) I run Windows XP SP3 32-bit on my machine, and have run it with multiple SSDs (X25-M, 320, and 510-series).
2) I use Intel's SSD Toolbox version 2.0.2.000.
3) I disable System Restore (Control Panel -> System -> System Restore -> check "Turn off System Restore on all drives")
4) I do not touch or adjust any Windows services from stock. That means:
And I have never, EVER seen this error. Again: *ever*. If you want me to make a video proving that fact and upload it to Youtube, just let me know, I'll be more than happy to.
If anyone here is messing around with Windows Services and experiencing problems after doing so, that's your own fault. Sorry, that's just my stance on it. There's really no reason to mess with any Services on Windows -- you're just asking for trouble.
And I fully agree with / sympathise with your complaints about the SSD Toolbox being written in .NET; I couldn't care less about the disk space needed (I have many .NET-specific applications and games on my machine, plus enterprise-level applications), but tools of this nature really should be written in either C or C++. I just hate frameworks/unnecessary layers of abstraction (one of the many reasons computing is becoming crap...).