This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Why does SSD benchmark so low in smaller puters? What holds them back?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:42 PM
.jpg){kind=link}
%20SSD.jpg){kind=link}
%20SSD%20RAID0.jpg){kind=link}
5 REPLIES 5
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:45 PM
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:53 PM
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:58 PM
Sorry for the photo mess, but at least they are in now.
So the question is why the lower powered puters get such low Disk benchmark scores as compared to the bigger powerful machines?
It's always been my experience that a hard drive will score relatively the same benchmark, whether it is in an old Pent 4 PC or a more recent one with a big dual core.
Is it the smaller machines that holds the SSD back, or is it the i7 that somehow "boosts" the SSD performance, or none of the above?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 07:04 PM
