Why does SSD benchmark so low in smaller puters? What holds them back?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:42 PM
Anyone have any idea why the huge differences in benhmarks?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:45 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:53 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 06:58 PM
Sorry for the photo mess, but at least they are in now.
So the question is why the lower powered puters get such low Disk benchmark scores as compared to the bigger powerful machines?
It's always been my experience that a hard drive will score relatively the same benchmark, whether it is in an old Pent 4 PC or a more recent one with a big dual core.
Is it the smaller machines that holds the SSD back, or is it the i7 that somehow "boosts" the SSD performance, or none of the above?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-09-2009 07:04 PM
Just to add to my confusion, this copying was done on the T4200 benchmarked above, showing a max. write speed of 65.8 mbs, yet it's copying a movie file here at 105 mbs.
.jpg){kind=link}
%20SSD.jpg){kind=link}
%20SSD%20RAID0.jpg){kind=link}
