<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Its not right but toolbox says it is ok? in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/its-not-right-but-toolbox-says-it-is-ok/m-p/21231#M9344</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I posted a bit earlier about an SSD in an embedded platform, with an oldish linux and ext3 partitions, I get write errors and wondered if it was because the use pattern I had was wearing out on bit of the drive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took the drive out and put in a windows box to have a look with the toolbox program, I had to reformat to NTFS to get anywhere, but figured a full format would find the sort of errors I am looking for so why not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It formatted just fine, it passed a couple of surface scans, and toolbox says it is 100% ok after a full diagnostic scan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Toolbox shows 100% health and life, it seems unlikely that the toolbox would be fooled by a format, but is that the case, might I have wiped out the lifetime and error information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I looked at the smart information (copy to clipboard would be nice about here )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything is in green so I assume ok, things like no reallocated sectors suggest the drive is not even covering up problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So is it perfectly healthy, or have I somehow wiped the counters that would show problems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:26:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-28T11:26:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Its not right but toolbox says it is ok?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/its-not-right-but-toolbox-says-it-is-ok/m-p/21231#M9344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I posted a bit earlier about an SSD in an embedded platform, with an oldish linux and ext3 partitions, I get write errors and wondered if it was because the use pattern I had was wearing out on bit of the drive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took the drive out and put in a windows box to have a look with the toolbox program, I had to reformat to NTFS to get anywhere, but figured a full format would find the sort of errors I am looking for so why not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It formatted just fine, it passed a couple of surface scans, and toolbox says it is 100% ok after a full diagnostic scan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Toolbox shows 100% health and life, it seems unlikely that the toolbox would be fooled by a format, but is that the case, might I have wiped out the lifetime and error information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I looked at the smart information (copy to clipboard would be nice about here )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything is in green so I assume ok, things like no reallocated sectors suggest the drive is not even covering up problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So is it perfectly healthy, or have I somehow wiped the counters that would show problems?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:26:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/its-not-right-but-toolbox-says-it-is-ok/m-p/21231#M9344</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-28T11:26:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

