<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SSD520 warm replug attack - ideas &amp; feadback from intel yet? in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/ssd520-warm-replug-attack-ideas-feadback-from-intel-yet/m-p/20983#M9096</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the recent security conference, some guys demonstrated that the intel SSD520 can be unpluged from the original PC and then be repluged to the attacking PC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed&lt;/A&gt; (Warm Replug Attack against Desktop PCs)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to the described tests, other vendor disks firmware detect the unplugging of the SATA cable and lock the drive making this type of attack useless. Has anyone seen a ticket / bug yaddressing this issue? For it looks like a "bug" that can be fixed with a firmware update. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-07T22:56:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SSD520 warm replug attack - ideas &amp; feadback from intel yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/ssd520-warm-replug-attack-ideas-feadback-from-intel-yet/m-p/20983#M9096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on the recent security conference, some guys demonstrated that the intel SSD520 can be unpluged from the original PC and then be repluged to the attacking PC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed&lt;/A&gt; (Warm Replug Attack against Desktop PCs)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to the described tests, other vendor disks firmware detect the unplugging of the SATA cable and lock the drive making this type of attack useless. Has anyone seen a ticket / bug yaddressing this issue? For it looks like a "bug" that can be fixed with a firmware update. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/ssd520-warm-replug-attack-ideas-feadback-from-intel-yet/m-p/20983#M9096</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-07T22:56:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

