<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic dual booting Win7 with accelerated volumes is possible - is it dangerous? in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/dual-booting-win7-with-accelerated-volumes-is-possible-is-it/m-p/20323#M8436</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I couldn't find any white paper or other information about this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have workstations that are equipped with normal HDs and cache msata 20GB SSDs. They work as accelerated volume under Intel RST.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, we do dual-boot 2 Win7 installations in separate partitions on the HD. The intention was to disable the acceleration/caching in one of the Win7 installations. As we found out these settings don't seem to be stored in the Win7 installation (probably in the RAID controller).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which means if the acceleration is enabled in one Win7 installation it will also be enabled after booting the second Win7 installation!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Surprisingly this seems to work without problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a danger of data corruption (my hair stands up seeing RAID0 in this context)? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the cached data on the SSD rebuilt every time the other Win7 installation is booted and thus the acceleration effect lost?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, is it possible to disable acceleration in one Win7 installation and only have it in the other one?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd be happy to read how the SSD-caching works, which files are stored on the SSD!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:50:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-16T19:50:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>dual booting Win7 with accelerated volumes is possible - is it dangerous?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/dual-booting-win7-with-accelerated-volumes-is-possible-is-it/m-p/20323#M8436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I couldn't find any white paper or other information about this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have workstations that are equipped with normal HDs and cache msata 20GB SSDs. They work as accelerated volume under Intel RST.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, we do dual-boot 2 Win7 installations in separate partitions on the HD. The intention was to disable the acceleration/caching in one of the Win7 installations. As we found out these settings don't seem to be stored in the Win7 installation (probably in the RAID controller).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which means if the acceleration is enabled in one Win7 installation it will also be enabled after booting the second Win7 installation!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Surprisingly this seems to work without problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a danger of data corruption (my hair stands up seeing RAID0 in this context)? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the cached data on the SSD rebuilt every time the other Win7 installation is booted and thus the acceleration effect lost?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, is it possible to disable acceleration in one Win7 installation and only have it in the other one?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd be happy to read how the SSD-caching works, which files are stored on the SSD!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:50:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/dual-booting-win7-with-accelerated-volumes-is-possible-is-it/m-p/20323#M8436</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-16T19:50:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

