<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Intel SSD 750 Wear Leveling Count in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15730#M5572</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Johnytec,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Intel® SSD 750 Series is a NVMe PCIe drive, and in some things it is different from previous generation SSD's. The information presented by some SMART attributes has changed, so it is displayed in a different way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the information you provided, it seems your drive is working correctly, and it has taken a minimum amount of the expected wear. Here is some information that will help you understand this a little better:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Raw amount shown for the Wear Leveling Count is actually the decimal presentation of a binary number. The Raw binary value is composed of different bytes that contain the information necessary for the Intel® SSD Toolbox to determine the values that are relevant for the user:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Minimum erase cycles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Maximum erase cycles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Average erase cycles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Normalized value&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the different bytes indicate amounts that are independent from each other, and they change continuously; when they are shown in decimal form as a single number, it is expected to be very high, and it only becomes meaningful when the toolbox extracts the relevant information from it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case, it indicates that the Minimum erase cycles is 2, Maximum erase cycles is 4, and Average erase cycles is 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The most important one is actually the Normalized value: 100. This decrements from 100 to 0 as the blocks of the drive are written to/erased. Since it still shows 100, it means that the drive erase cycles haven't reached even 1% of the rated/maximum number of erase/programming cycles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For more information, you can review the following documents:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-specifications/ssd-750-spec.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-specifications/ssd-750-spec.pdf&lt;/A&gt; Intel® SSD 750 Series - Product Specification&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbenavides</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T17:56:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel SSD 750 Wear Leveling Count</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15729#M5571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just purchased a retail box fresh new SSD 750 and installed Windows 10 on it. It's working well and the test speed is good. owever, I ran Intel SSD Toolbox 3.3.1 on it and checked its SMART attributes. Here is what I got.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;The raw figure of "AD Wear Leveling Count" is way too large and it's growing every day.&lt;/B&gt; I didn't use the drive to do much except installing Windows 10 on it. Is this normal or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, what does the Minimum/Maximum/Average erase cycles mean? The figures seems to be changing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And, can anybody tell me how to find read and written TBA measurement?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Update: Using another utility, AIDA64, I had new readings regarding Wear Leveling Count (Raw). It's much smaller figure now, but considering my other SSD's usually being 0 for this count, I'm very worrying about this drive. &lt;B&gt;Did I receive a bad drive? &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 04:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15729#M5571</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBrow23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-05T04:43:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel SSD 750 Wear Leveling Count</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15730#M5572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Johnytec,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Intel® SSD 750 Series is a NVMe PCIe drive, and in some things it is different from previous generation SSD's. The information presented by some SMART attributes has changed, so it is displayed in a different way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the information you provided, it seems your drive is working correctly, and it has taken a minimum amount of the expected wear. Here is some information that will help you understand this a little better:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Raw amount shown for the Wear Leveling Count is actually the decimal presentation of a binary number. The Raw binary value is composed of different bytes that contain the information necessary for the Intel® SSD Toolbox to determine the values that are relevant for the user:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Minimum erase cycles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Maximum erase cycles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Average erase cycles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Normalized value&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since the different bytes indicate amounts that are independent from each other, and they change continuously; when they are shown in decimal form as a single number, it is expected to be very high, and it only becomes meaningful when the toolbox extracts the relevant information from it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case, it indicates that the Minimum erase cycles is 2, Maximum erase cycles is 4, and Average erase cycles is 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The most important one is actually the Normalized value: 100. This decrements from 100 to 0 as the blocks of the drive are written to/erased. Since it still shows 100, it means that the drive erase cycles haven't reached even 1% of the rated/maximum number of erase/programming cycles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For more information, you can review the following documents:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-specifications/ssd-750-spec.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-specifications/ssd-750-spec.pdf&lt;/A&gt; Intel® SSD 750 Series - Product Specification&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 17:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15730#M5572</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbenavides</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-07T17:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel SSD 750 Wear Leveling Count</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15731#M5573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Jonathan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for such a detailed explanation. Now I understand why the raw value been changing in that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just purchased this drive so it's fresh new with every value very small. I'm quite satisfied with this drive, and actually I'm using it in a Pci-e x16 slot on a Z77 mainboard, Asrock Z77 Extreme 4, and currently I'm using it as OS drive loaded with Windows 10 Enterprise. It is working well. Startup time is very short, and I can barely see the loading Windows logo. Awesome work, Intel! &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:52:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15731#M5573</guid>
      <dc:creator>JBrow23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-08T14:52:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel SSD 750 Wear Leveling Count</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15732#M5574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am glad that we were able to answer your question. Feel free to use the /community/tech/solidstate/content Solid State Drives Communities for any new inquiries about your Intel SSD.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 16:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssd-750-wear-leveling-count/m-p/15732#M5574</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbenavides</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-09-08T16:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

