<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: INTEL SSDPEKKW010T7 - smart error? in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7739#M339</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for the honest answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after the data corruption issue with the first firmware on linux&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and obviously fragile hardware, my confidence in intel ssds is gone (especially when using in linux, you do not even provide a ssd toolkit for linux ... )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'll send it back and replace it with a samsung, as all my 3 year old samsung 830s work flawlessly since day1 on debian!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:54:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-20T22:54:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>INTEL SSDPEKKW010T7 - smart error?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7737#M337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i bought an Intel M.2 600p with 1TB just a couple of days ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On there i got my debian system, with an encrypted /home.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now smartctl is telling me, that the health self-assessment test failed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     - available spare has fallen below threshold&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02, NSID 0x1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Critical Warning:                   0x01&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Temperature:                        29 Celsius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Available Spare:                    9%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Available Spare Threshold:          10%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Percentage Used:                    0%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Units Read:                    4,020,000 [2.05 TB]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Units Written:                 1,224,368 [626 GB]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Host Read Commands:                 26,920,285&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Host Write Commands:                23,527,124&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Controller Busy Time:               154&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Power Cycles:                       16&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Power On Hours:                     197&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unsafe Shutdowns:                   2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Media and Data Integrity Errors:    0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error Information Log Entries:      0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Warning  Comp. Temperature Time:    1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Critical Comp. Temperature Time:    0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That does either mean:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- the ssd has already used spare space and is about to fail - after a mere 626GB written(!!!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- the smartctl shows bugged stuff?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- the firmware is STILL not working properly on linux (i read alot on data corruption with the original firmware ...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can someone from intel answer this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'm still able to return this ssd, since it's only a few days old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7737#M337</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-20T16:16:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: INTEL SSDPEKKW010T7 - smart error?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7738#M338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello mer81at,&lt;/P&gt; We understand that the SMART values for your Intel® SSD 600p (1TB) show the drive has consumed all of its available reserve space. The drive should't go through its available reserve space after such a low amount of data written on it. We recommend installing the drive on a different system to confirm if you get the same results.If possible, please test it on a Windows 10* PC to compare it with the SMART details pulled by &lt;A href="https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27330/Intel-Solid-State-Drive-Toolbox" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27330/Intel-Solid-State-Drive-Toolbox&lt;/A&gt; Intel® SSD Toolbox. If you get the same results, we recommend reaching your reseller to request a replacement. Best regards,Eugenio F.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7738#M338</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-20T22:46:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: INTEL SSDPEKKW010T7 - smart error?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7739#M339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for the honest answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after the data corruption issue with the first firmware on linux&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and obviously fragile hardware, my confidence in intel ssds is gone (especially when using in linux, you do not even provide a ssd toolkit for linux ... )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i'll send it back and replace it with a samsung, as all my 3 year old samsung 830s work flawlessly since day1 on debian!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:54:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/intel-ssdpekkw010t7-smart-error/m-p/7739#M339</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-20T22:54:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

