<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic winsat r/w results for SSD worse than SATA hard drive? in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/winsat-r-w-results-for-ssd-worse-than-sata-hard-drive/m-p/10714#M2244</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Running winsat in win7 on my PC's SATA drive shows approx 104 Mb/s seq read and 113 Mb/s seq write. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After running winsat on the new Intel 530 Series 120GB SSD the results drop to 34 Mb/s seq read, and 29 Mb/s seq write.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is it possible that the SSD is so much slower than the old SATA drive? Does this indicate a bad SSD?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jjt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-01T14:57:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>winsat r/w results for SSD worse than SATA hard drive?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/winsat-r-w-results-for-ssd-worse-than-sata-hard-drive/m-p/10714#M2244</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Running winsat in win7 on my PC's SATA drive shows approx 104 Mb/s seq read and 113 Mb/s seq write. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After running winsat on the new Intel 530 Series 120GB SSD the results drop to 34 Mb/s seq read, and 29 Mb/s seq write.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is it possible that the SSD is so much slower than the old SATA drive? Does this indicate a bad SSD?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/winsat-r-w-results-for-ssd-worse-than-sata-hard-drive/m-p/10714#M2244</guid>
      <dc:creator>jjt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-01T14:57:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: winsat r/w results for SSD worse than SATA hard drive?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/winsat-r-w-results-for-ssd-worse-than-sata-hard-drive/m-p/10715#M2245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The winsat results were obtained by connecting the SSD to my PC going through a USB 2.0 port.. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After installing the SSD in a laptop, winsat reports 261 Mb/s seq read and 161 Mb/s seq write.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 17:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/winsat-r-w-results-for-ssd-worse-than-sata-hard-drive/m-p/10715#M2245</guid>
      <dc:creator>jjt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-01T17:32:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

