<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Disappointed with Intel 530 240 gig performance in Solid State Drives (NAND)</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10449#M2123</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sammy49, may I ask for the conditions you are using to test the Intel® SSD 530? Such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;System model&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SATA controller and driver version&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Operating system&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The benchmark tool used to measure the performance, its results, and any other software being used.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jose_H_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-10T14:26:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Disappointed with Intel 530 240 gig performance</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10448#M2122</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have set this up and optimized it fully but the performance is mediocre at best , yeah a little better than my mechanical HD but not nearly as impressive as i thought it would be or what Intel would have you believe .  On the retail box it says (super fast hard drive replacement) and comes with a Speed Demon sticker lol.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope Intel will rework the firmware to make it a little more impressive .  Not a happy customer &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10448#M2122</guid>
      <dc:creator>CNash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-09T17:47:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disappointed with Intel 530 240 gig performance</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10449#M2123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sammy49, may I ask for the conditions you are using to test the Intel® SSD 530? Such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;System model&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SATA controller and driver version&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Operating system&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The benchmark tool used to measure the performance, its results, and any other software being used.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10449#M2123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jose_H_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-10T14:26:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disappointed with Intel 530 240 gig performance</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10450#M2124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am just wondering why this SSD series is rated so low for speed at just about every review site out there ,  intel says it's super fast but it's anything but.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The below is just another in a long list of poor to mediocre at best reviews.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;EFFECTIVE SPEED: POOR &lt;A href="http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Faq/What-is-the-effective-SSD-speed-index/42" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Faq/What-is-the-effective-SSD-speed-index/42&lt;/A&gt; ?&lt;P&gt;At just 5 months old the Intel 530 Series SSD is the newest SSD in the group test. Unfortunately the 530 uses the same basic formula we have seen going back two and a half years. Sporting a &lt;A href="http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Search?searchTerm=sandforce&amp;amp;page=1&amp;amp;tab=SProducts" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Search?searchTerm=sandforce&amp;amp;page=1&amp;amp;tab=SProducts&lt;/A&gt; Sandforce 2281 controller coupled with 20nm NAND flash the performance profile struggles with &lt;A href="http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Faq/What-is-incompressible-data/43" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Faq/What-is-incompressible-data/43&lt;/A&gt; incompressible data and predictably favors reads over writes as with all the other Sandforce 2281 drives we have seen. With peak and average sequential read/write speeds of 498/154 and 454/131 MB/s&lt;B&gt; the 120GB Intel 530 lags the group leaders by 50%.&lt;/B&gt; Small file 4K peak and average performance clocked in at 34/101 and 26/76 MB/s which is slightly above average for a leading 120GB SSD. There are faster and cheaper alternatives available in the &lt;A href="http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ssd.userbenchmark.com/&lt;/A&gt; group test. [&lt;I&gt;Feb '14 &lt;A href="http://www.userbenchmark.com/SSDrivePro/User?id=30" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.userbenchmark.com/SSDrivePro/User?id=30&lt;/A&gt; SSDrivePro&lt;/I&gt;]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 15:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/solid-state-drives-nand/disappointed-with-intel-530-240-gig-performance/m-p/10450#M2124</guid>
      <dc:creator>CNash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-12T15:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

