<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Spare area and NAND size on 160GB 320/G3 in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9441#M7887</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for the explanation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-15T22:13:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spare area and NAND size on 160GB 320/G3</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9439#M7885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please confirm the user-available area, spare area, and size of the NAND chips used in the 160GB G3. My understanding is that the 320-series uses a 10-channel architecture with 6.25% spare area as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;600GB: 640GB total area, 40GB spare area (6.25%), 20 x 32GB NAND, 2 NAND per channel&lt;/P&gt;300GB: 320GB total area, 20GB spare area (6.25%), 10 x 32GB NAND120GB: 128GB total area, 8GB spare area (6.25%), 8 x 16GB NAND&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore, shouldn't the 160GB version have the following architecture?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;150GB: 160GB total area, 10GB spare area (6.25%), 10 x 16GB NAND&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to the &lt;A href="http://download.intel.com/design/flash/nand/325152.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://download.intel.com/design/flash/nand/325152.pdf&lt;/A&gt; product spec, the 160GB model has 312,581,808 sectors = 160,041,885,696 bytes of user-addressable space. In order to have 6.25% spare area, the SSD would need a total capacity of ~171GB. What is the size of each NAND chip? Or is it 160GB total area and 0% spare area?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9439#M7885</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T19:44:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spare area and NAND size on 160GB 320/G3</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9440#M7886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the 'gb' in the labelled capacity is 1,000,000,000 bytes.  1gb of actual nand capacity is 1,073,741,824 bytes.  if you redo the math, the 300gb and 600gb models have about 13% spare area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the 120gb model can't be 8 x 16gb, as the controller is 10-channel, so it's actually 5 x 8gb + 5 x 16gb (like its x25-m 120gb predecessor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;160gb and smaller models have ~7% spare area, like the x25-m.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9440#M7886</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmokk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T21:09:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spare area and NAND size on 160GB 320/G3</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9441#M7887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for the explanation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/spare-area-and-nand-size-on-160gb-320-g3/m-p/9441#M7887</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T22:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

