https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6472#M6334 <P>I'm using the Areca 1880ixl-8 port. w 512mb cache.</P> Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:05:01 GMT idata 2010-10-29T05:05:01Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6469#M6331 <P>Is it wise to do this?</P><P></P><P>I have 4 g2 and 2 g1 drives here and I've put them on a raid0 array together. I'm noticing some strange benchmark results though like on ATTO some of the sizes like 128 and 256 are super slow compared to the rest.</P><P></P><P>It seems to be performing pretty well though. But should I image this and replace the g1 with g2 drives?</P> Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:57:44 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6469#M6331 idata 2010-10-18T06:57:44Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6470#M6332 <P>So no one's got info on this issue?</P><P></P><P>I mean the performance seems decent in usage. But I'm just wondering if I'm unintentionally hampering this array too much.</P><P></P><P>[IMG]<A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/iobench.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/iobench.jpg</A> <A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/iobench.jpg[/IMG]" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/iobench.jpg[/IMG]</A></P><P>[IMG]<A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/as-ssd-benchArecaARC-1880-V101620101-13-14PM.png" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/as-ssd-benchArecaARC-1880-V101620101-13-14PM.png</A> <A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/as-ssd-benchArecaARC-1880-V101620101-13-14PM.png[/IMG]" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/as-ssd-benchArecaARC-1880-V101620101-13-14PM.png[/IMG]</A></P> Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:44:50 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6470#M6332 idata 2010-10-20T22:44:50Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6471#M6333 <P>You have six Intel SSDs in a single RAID0?</P><P></P><P>What RAID controller are you using? The ICH9/10R gets bottlenecked at around 650MB/s.</P> Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:56:07 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6471#M6333 idata 2010-10-29T04:56:07Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6472#M6334 <P>I'm using the Areca 1880ixl-8 port. w 512mb cache.</P> Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:05:01 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6472#M6334 idata 2010-10-29T05:05:01Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6473#M6335 <P>Do you have your ATTO benches?</P><P></P><P></P><P>I have seen weird SSD behavior on RAID controllers though.... i.e. A PERC 5/i and 6/i can actually limit IOPs.</P> Fri, 29 Oct 2010 05:13:03 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6473#M6335 idata 2010-10-29T05:13:03Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6474#M6336 <P>Here's one on the default settings.</P><P></P><P><A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/attodefault.jpg?t=1288335523" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/attodefault.jpg?t=1288335523</A> <A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/attodefault.jpg?t=1288335523" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/attodefault.jpg?t=1288335523</A></P> Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:59:47 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6474#M6336 idata 2010-10-29T06:59:47Z https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6475#M6337 <P>Here's the windows disk test.</P><P></P><P>[IMG]<A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/testHDD.jpg" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/testHDD.jpg</A> <A href="http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/testHDD.jpg[/IMG]" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/bb352/tet5uo/testHDD.jpg[/IMG]</A></P><P></P><P>that max latency is through the roof...</P> Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:33:26 GMT https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/using-gen2-and-gen1-drives-in-same-array/m-p/6475#M6337 idata 2010-11-01T15:33:26Z