<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Seq read performance with Intel X25V SSD in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/seq-read-performance-with-intel-x25v-ssd/m-p/6185#M6047</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://communities.intel.com/thread/14928?tstart=30" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://communities.intel.com/thread/14928?tstart=30&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-07T10:08:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Seq read performance with Intel X25V SSD</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/seq-read-performance-with-intel-x25v-ssd/m-p/6184#M6046</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to measure the seq 100%read performance of Intel X25V SSD on linux machine.  Issue that I see here is that I am getting different IOPS with different states of the disk i.e consider the below two cases&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) erase the disk -&amp;gt; run rand 100%write -&amp;gt; seq 100% read&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) erase the disk -&amp;gt; run seq 100% write -&amp;gt; seq 100% read&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IOPS are different in both the above cases (varying by 5K to 6K).  Same behaviour is seen even with seq read done after some seq/rand writes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this behavriour due to wear-leveling done in SSD ? If yes, what is the best way to capture seq 100% read performance ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(OR)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I missing anything in setup ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:06:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/seq-read-performance-with-intel-x25v-ssd/m-p/6184#M6046</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-06T12:06:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Seq read performance with Intel X25V SSD</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/seq-read-performance-with-intel-x25v-ssd/m-p/6185#M6047</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://communities.intel.com/thread/14928?tstart=30" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://communities.intel.com/thread/14928?tstart=30&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/seq-read-performance-with-intel-x25v-ssd/m-p/6185#M6047</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-07T10:08:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

