<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: X25 for Enterprise use in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5872#M5734</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The only problem with using SSDs in RAID is the Tool Box will not work because it can not distinguish the difference one drive for another , So it would hard to keep them clean and the performance would degrade over time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RGiff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-24T13:53:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X25 for Enterprise use</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5871#M5733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;H all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking an upgrading/replacing my SAN with some SSDs (SAN will be used for Oracle OLTP DB Cluster)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am potentially looking at X25-E disks (12 in a RAID 10), but I have been told a better/more ecomonical use would be a RAID5, and the actual difference on SSD between the two RAID levels is minimal (as compared to conventional HDDs where the write impact is noticable). I know it will come down to the read/write ratios, etc. but does anyone have any experience of the actual difference?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I said I was looking at the X25-E (or OCZ 2 EX), but a SAN manufacturer is trying to convince me that the X25-M (mlc) will be fine. Any comments on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;J.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5871#M5733</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-22T20:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25 for Enterprise use</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5872#M5734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only problem with using SSDs in RAID is the Tool Box will not work because it can not distinguish the difference one drive for another , So it would hard to keep them clean and the performance would degrade over time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5872#M5734</guid>
      <dc:creator>RGiff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-24T13:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25 for Enterprise use</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5873#M5735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for replying &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hadn't even considered/thought about the Intel software tools (assumed the tool wouln't work as these disks will be in a 8Gbps FC SAN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any data on RAID 10 v RAID 5 with SSD in an ORacle environment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;J.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ps - Anyone know when the Intel 100GB eMLC drives will be released?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:49:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-for-enterprise-use/m-p/5873#M5735</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-26T15:49:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

