<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic parition alignment of X25-M G2 under Linux in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/parition-alignment-of-x25-m-g2-under-linux/m-p/5643#M5505</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How should one partition an X25-M G2 under Linux?  I have read two different suggestions, both of which suggest using fdisk with a custom head and sector count, but they differ on the actual values.  Both agree that partitions need to be aligned based on the SSD's erase block size.  I believe that the X25-M for example uses an EBS of 512 KiB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) fdisk -H 224 -S 56 /dev/sdX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) fdisk -H 32 -S 32 /dev/sdX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;References: &lt;A href="http://ldn.linuxfoundation.org/blog-entry/aligning-filesystems-ssd%E2%80%99s-erase-block-size" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ldn.linuxfoundation.org/blog-entry/aligning-filesystems-ssd%E2%80%99s-erase-block-size&lt;/A&gt; 1 and &lt;A href="http://www.nuclex.org/blog/personal/80-aligning-an-ssd-on-linux" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.nuclex.org/blog/personal/80-aligning-an-ssd-on-linux&lt;/A&gt; 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advice is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-28T22:14:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>parition alignment of X25-M G2 under Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/parition-alignment-of-x25-m-g2-under-linux/m-p/5643#M5505</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How should one partition an X25-M G2 under Linux?  I have read two different suggestions, both of which suggest using fdisk with a custom head and sector count, but they differ on the actual values.  Both agree that partitions need to be aligned based on the SSD's erase block size.  I believe that the X25-M for example uses an EBS of 512 KiB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) fdisk -H 224 -S 56 /dev/sdX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) fdisk -H 32 -S 32 /dev/sdX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;References: &lt;A href="http://ldn.linuxfoundation.org/blog-entry/aligning-filesystems-ssd%E2%80%99s-erase-block-size" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://ldn.linuxfoundation.org/blog-entry/aligning-filesystems-ssd%E2%80%99s-erase-block-size&lt;/A&gt; 1 and &lt;A href="http://www.nuclex.org/blog/personal/80-aligning-an-ssd-on-linux" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.nuclex.org/blog/personal/80-aligning-an-ssd-on-linux&lt;/A&gt; 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advice is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/parition-alignment-of-x25-m-g2-under-linux/m-p/5643#M5505</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-28T22:14:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: parition alignment of X25-M G2 under Linux</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/parition-alignment-of-x25-m-g2-under-linux/m-p/5644#M5506</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, unfortunately we do not support Linux; I suggest looking for this info under the Linux forums of support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/parition-alignment-of-x25-m-g2-under-linux/m-p/5644#M5506</guid>
      <dc:creator>MBall5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-01T20:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

