<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: X25-V : Odd datas. in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-odd-datas/m-p/5633#M5495</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Jaeger,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          The issue with folder properties not showing same size as c: drive properties could also be related to setup in OS and not related to storage drive.  Have you been able to check another person's system with a different drive to see what it shows?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for the strange read performance for HD Tune, would you please try another tool that measures sequential read performance, like CrystalDiskMark, to see what it shows for performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brady (Intel SSD Tech)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Charles_F_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-02T06:12:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X25-V : Odd datas.</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-odd-datas/m-p/5632#M5494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not a native enlish speaker, so please forgive me for my grammar mistakes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need some help to understand some strange things, here we come :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I own a X25-V 40GB, nothing special here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problems are, as you can see on my screenshot, showed in red circle : I use 16,8GB on my SSD on C: (on the left) but Windows shows only 12,5GB used (on the right). This is the first problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second, is the HD Tune screenshot. I have done several pass, results are the same : 266MB/s max, 223MB/s average, 87,5 MB/s min, Burst Rate 98MB/s. It's higher than the 170MB/s average announced in linear read, but minimum and burst rate seem to be to low.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moreover, in the first ~40%, transfer rate is pretty low (coincidence ? Only ~40% of the space is used).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think of that ? Last firmware, AHCI enabled, Intel SSD Toolbox used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-odd-datas/m-p/5632#M5494</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-24T19:09:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25-V : Odd datas.</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-odd-datas/m-p/5633#M5495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Jaeger,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;          The issue with folder properties not showing same size as c: drive properties could also be related to setup in OS and not related to storage drive.  Have you been able to check another person's system with a different drive to see what it shows?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for the strange read performance for HD Tune, would you please try another tool that measures sequential read performance, like CrystalDiskMark, to see what it shows for performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brady (Intel SSD Tech)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:12:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-odd-datas/m-p/5633#M5495</guid>
      <dc:creator>Charles_F_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-02T06:12:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

