<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic X25-V is performing better then X25-M drive in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-is-performing-better-then-x25-m-drive/m-p/5504#M5366</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I first bought a x25-v ssd drive and was very impressed with the drive so i went out and bought a x-25 m and i am running HD tune and As SSD benchmark tools and my intel x25-v in HD Tune read test came back with 113.6mb/s min 207.7 mb/s max and average 172.9mb/s average.  On the x25-m i get 160mb/s min 174.9 max and 174.1 avg.  I dont understand why my v drive has better performance then the m drive.  I have updated both with the latest firmware and have used the ssd toolbox and both are installed on windows 7.  One difference is the x25-m drive doesnt have a OS on the drive the x25-V does.  Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-28T22:27:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X25-V is performing better then X25-M drive</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-is-performing-better-then-x25-m-drive/m-p/5504#M5366</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I first bought a x25-v ssd drive and was very impressed with the drive so i went out and bought a x-25 m and i am running HD tune and As SSD benchmark tools and my intel x25-v in HD Tune read test came back with 113.6mb/s min 207.7 mb/s max and average 172.9mb/s average.  On the x25-m i get 160mb/s min 174.9 max and 174.1 avg.  I dont understand why my v drive has better performance then the m drive.  I have updated both with the latest firmware and have used the ssd toolbox and both are installed on windows 7.  One difference is the x25-m drive doesnt have a OS on the drive the x25-V does.  Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:27:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-is-performing-better-then-x25-m-drive/m-p/5504#M5366</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-28T22:27:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25-V is performing better then X25-M drive</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-is-performing-better-then-x25-m-drive/m-p/5505#M5367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please explain why i am getting better results out of my v drive instead of the m drive.  I have seen people get way better then what i am getting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 05:44:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-v-is-performing-better-then-x25-m-drive/m-p/5505#M5367</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-31T05:44:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

