<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Measuring Intel X25-V SSD performance with IOmeter on linux in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5498#M5360</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ramu,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a known incompatibility with the IOMeter Dynamo on current Linux operating systems. This problem causes IOMeter to only issue non-queued IO. The IOMeter administrators are planning to fix this in a future version.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-01T17:13:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Measuring Intel X25-V SSD performance with IOmeter on linux</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5497#M5359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to measure the performance of Intel X25-V SSD with IOmeter on linux.  I am running dynamo on linux host (where SSD is connected) and IOmeter GUI on another windows machine.  Both linux machine and windows machine are in the same LAN.  Results that I get with this setup are far away from benchmark results given by Intel.  If connect the SSD to a windows machine and measure the performance with IOmeter (here dynamo and IOmeter run on windows machine) then I get results close to benchmark results.  Does this mean that Intel benchmark results are captured on windows machine OR am I missing anything with my linux setup in capturing the correct results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 06:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5497#M5359</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-27T06:26:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Measuring Intel X25-V SSD performance with IOmeter on linux</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5498#M5360</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ramu,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a known incompatibility with the IOMeter Dynamo on current Linux operating systems. This problem causes IOMeter to only issue non-queued IO. The IOMeter administrators are planning to fix this in a future version.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5498#M5360</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-01T17:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Measuring Intel X25-V SSD performance with IOmeter on linux</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5499#M5361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Allenwa,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we use queue depth of 1 with dynamo running on linux then we should get the same performace as that of iometer on windows with queue depth of 1.....right ? OR Is there an issue with queue depth of 1 also in case of running dynamo on linux ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:34:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/measuring-intel-x25-v-ssd-performance-with-iometer-on-linux/m-p/5499#M5361</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-02T05:34:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

