<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic X25-E 64GB cluster size question in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-e-64gb-cluster-size-question/m-p/5249#M5111</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an X25-E 64GB and I would like your opinion on what would give better benchmark results and performance, a Windows 7 installation with cluster size of 64K or the default 4K and why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally I have tried both sizes and I haven't seen much of difference.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:47:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-24T13:47:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X25-E 64GB cluster size question</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-e-64gb-cluster-size-question/m-p/5249#M5111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an X25-E 64GB and I would like your opinion on what would give better benchmark results and performance, a Windows 7 installation with cluster size of 64K or the default 4K and why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally I have tried both sizes and I haven't seen much of difference.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:47:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-e-64gb-cluster-size-question/m-p/5249#M5111</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-24T13:47:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

