<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: X25-M(V) erase block size? in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-v-erase-block-size/m-p/5197#M5059</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I would like to know that unfortunately Intel cannot disclose the size of the block used at the Intel Solid State Drives, I suggest you to use the default size if the hardware provides de option to set the block size.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MBall5</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-04T18:49:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X25-M(V) erase block size?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-v-erase-block-size/m-p/5196#M5058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On the Internet I've found two different oppinions about erase block size of Intel's X25-&lt;B&gt;M&lt;/B&gt; (and X25-&lt;B&gt;V&lt;/B&gt;) SSDs: &lt;B&gt;128&lt;/B&gt;kB and &lt;B&gt;512&lt;/B&gt;kB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;128&lt;/B&gt;kB:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://techreport.com/articles.x/15433" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://techreport.com/articles.x/15433&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Intel gives an example in which a host system generates a 4KB write  request that, thanks to a drive's 128KB erase block size, actually  incurs a 128KB NAND write.  Dividing the NAND write size by the request  size yields the amplification factor, which is 32 in this case.  Intel  says the X25-M's write-amplification factor is extremely low at 1.1,  while "traditional" SSDs have much higher amplification factor of 20. &lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;512&lt;/B&gt;kB:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/2614/3" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.anandtech.com/show/2614/3&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Group a bunch of cells together and you've got a page.  A page is the  smallest structure you can program (write to) in a NAND flash device.   In the case of most MLC NAND flash each page is 4KB.  A block consists  of a number of pages, in the Intel MLC SSD a block is 128 pages (128  pages x 4KB per page = 512KB per block = 0.5MB).  A block is the  smallest structure you can erase.  So when you write to a SSD you can  write 4KB at a time, but when you erase from a SSD you have to erase  512KB at a time.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/intel-x25m-ssd_2.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/intel-x25m-ssd_2.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;For the X25-M this block is as large as 128 pages or 512 kilobytes or  half a megabyte. As a result, if there is a request to erase (or  rewrite) one page, the drive has to erase 128 pages.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and then again, even on this forum I've found both &lt;B&gt;128&lt;/B&gt;kB and &lt;B&gt;512&lt;/B&gt;kB info:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;128&lt;/B&gt;kB:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://communities.intel.com/message/28730#" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://communities.intel.com/message/28730#&lt;/A&gt; 28730&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;512&lt;/B&gt;kB:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://communities.intel.com/message/68942#" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://communities.intel.com/message/68942#&lt;/A&gt; 68942&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, can someone officially say: is the size of erase block on X25-M(V) &lt;B&gt;128&lt;/B&gt;kB or &lt;B&gt;512&lt;/B&gt;kB ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-v-erase-block-size/m-p/5196#M5058</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-20T18:39:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25-M(V) erase block size?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-v-erase-block-size/m-p/5197#M5059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I would like to know that unfortunately Intel cannot disclose the size of the block used at the Intel Solid State Drives, I suggest you to use the default size if the hardware provides de option to set the block size.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-v-erase-block-size/m-p/5197#M5059</guid>
      <dc:creator>MBall5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-04T18:49:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

