<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why such poor benchmarks with three X25M RAID0 on Adaptec 5405? in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-such-poor-benchmarks-with-three-x25m-raid0-on-adaptec-5405/m-p/5125#M4987</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have three 80 GB X25-m (G2) on an Adaptec 5405.  The partition is aligned. Here's what I get on AS SSD Benchmark:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;238 MB/ SEC reads are not what I expected.  I expected about 600 MB/ SEC.  Write speed is mediocre.  I've got the latest Win64 drivers from Adaptec installed.  5405 firmware is V5.2-0 16507. I have read and write-back cache enabled, I have a battery-backup for the Adaptec 5405. This is not worth all the money this setup cost me.  The drives are new, they cost about $800 total and the controller was $225 on eBay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using my X58 motherboard, here are the results from AS SSD Benchmark using these three X25M (G2) drives in Raid0 off the ICH10:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read performance looks great, due to cache. Write performance is awful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE'S THE BLISTERING SPEED THAT INTEL PROMISES?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I'm doing something wrong, someone please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-30T07:35:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why such poor benchmarks with three X25M RAID0 on Adaptec 5405?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-such-poor-benchmarks-with-three-x25m-raid0-on-adaptec-5405/m-p/5125#M4987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have three 80 GB X25-m (G2) on an Adaptec 5405.  The partition is aligned. Here's what I get on AS SSD Benchmark:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;238 MB/ SEC reads are not what I expected.  I expected about 600 MB/ SEC.  Write speed is mediocre.  I've got the latest Win64 drivers from Adaptec installed.  5405 firmware is V5.2-0 16507. I have read and write-back cache enabled, I have a battery-backup for the Adaptec 5405. This is not worth all the money this setup cost me.  The drives are new, they cost about $800 total and the controller was $225 on eBay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using my X58 motherboard, here are the results from AS SSD Benchmark using these three X25M (G2) drives in Raid0 off the ICH10:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read performance looks great, due to cache. Write performance is awful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WHERE'S THE BLISTERING SPEED THAT INTEL PROMISES?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I'm doing something wrong, someone please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-such-poor-benchmarks-with-three-x25m-raid0-on-adaptec-5405/m-p/5125#M4987</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-30T07:35:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why such poor benchmarks with three X25M RAID0 on Adaptec 5405?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-such-poor-benchmarks-with-three-x25m-raid0-on-adaptec-5405/m-p/5126#M4988</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Adaptec tech support pointed out that I had mistakenly set up my three X25-M drives as a SPANNED PARTITION and not RAID0!  I GOOFED!  Changing over to RAID0 and copying the backed-up drive image back onto the array did the trick!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:32:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-such-poor-benchmarks-with-three-x25m-raid0-on-adaptec-5405/m-p/5126#M4988</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-08T10:32:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

