<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Does it make sense to let 20% of the SSD size unpartitioned? in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4271#M4133</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;ambizytl schrieb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, my answer is no. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for this clear answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DZand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-24T23:23:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does it make sense to let 20% of the SSD size unpartitioned?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4267#M4129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are a lot of different statements regarding the best way to partition an SSD for the first use. I have read many statement, where people wrote, that 20% of the SSD size should not be partitioned. Does this action really make sense or is it even necessary? If yes, which are the reasons?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems logical, that the SSD partition(s) themselves should not be completely filled with data. A free space of approximately 20% will be required to prevent a noticeable performance decrease, especially in case of a missing Trim support. But why should users leave a part of the SSD, which is small sized anyway,  unpartitioned?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answers in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:47:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4267#M4129</guid>
      <dc:creator>DZand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-23T18:47:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does it make sense to let 20% of the SSD size unpartitioned?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4268#M4130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My main SSD is 160GB and would never fill it up to the point where only 20 percent was left. I have three SSD's, main 160, another 160, and an 80Gb as well. I don't see why there would be a need to leave 20% unavailable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Plus, I wouldn't do that even with a 300GB SSD. If one sees a need for more space, one can buy another HDD/SSD and put large files like Pictures, Movies, Music, etc. on that extra drive. Of course, this is my approach and others may think or do differently.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4268#M4130</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T15:34:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does it make sense to let 20% of the SSD size unpartitioned?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4269#M4131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@ ambizytl:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your comment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So your simple answer to the question of the thread title seems to be: "No". Or did I misunderstand something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By the way: As long as I have my 2 Intel Postville SSD'S I have always created partitions by utilising the whole SSD size leaving no space unpartitioned. On the other hand I took care, that there was always more than 20% free within each partition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Until now I didn't run ito any problem or performance breakdown.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4269#M4131</guid>
      <dc:creator>DZand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T17:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does it make sense to let 20% of the SSD size unpartitioned?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4270#M4132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, my answer is no. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4270#M4132</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T19:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does it make sense to let 20% of the SSD size unpartitioned?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4271#M4133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ambizytl schrieb:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, my answer is no. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for this clear answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/does-it-make-sense-to-let-20-of-the-ssd-size-unpartitioned/m-p/4271#M4133</guid>
      <dc:creator>DZand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T23:23:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

