<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Are My Writes Slow? in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3825#M3687</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;RBerles wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;@ KoiTsu&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to reread the standard there is quite the difference between SATA I, II , and III.  The changes are mostly in contact pressure, contact locking and noise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I spend most of my time in the ATA8-ACS working draft spec..  Have you checked out the &lt;A href="http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-Revision-3.0-FAQ-FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-Revision-3.0-FAQ-FINAL.pdf&lt;/A&gt; official SATA-IO SATA600 (SATA rev. 3) FAQ?  You know, from the people who participate in the T13 interface and ATA8 protocol specification?  If so, you'd know one of the Q&amp;amp;A items was:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q14: Were there any attenuation or jitter issues that had to be addressed with the jump to 6Gb/s?&lt;/P&gt;A14: Ensuring signal integrity was the primary challenge in doubling the SATA transfer speed for a second time &lt;B&gt;while using the same cables and connectors that were originally defined for the first generation 1.5Gb/s version&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Furthermore, in the &lt;A href="http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-6Gbs-Fast-Just-Got-Faster.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-6Gbs-Fast-Just-Got-Faster.pdf&lt;/A&gt; official SATA-IO SATA600 white paper, you can find the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SATA Revision 3.0 was designed to facilitate a much more elegant – and cost effective – migration to higher data rates. Rather than completely redefining the spec, SATA Revision 3.0 achieves its data rate increase by faster signal switching. While this has resulted in changes to the PHY, modifications to the protocol have been kept to a minimum. &lt;B&gt;In addition, SATA Revision 3.0 is backward compatible so that the same connectors and cabling used for SATA 3 Gb/s under SATA Revision 2.6 can be used for SATA 6Gb/s.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's not forget &lt;A href="http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-6-Gbs-The-Path-from-3gbs-to-6gbs.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-6-Gbs-The-Path-from-3gbs-to-6gbs.pdf&lt;/A&gt; another SATA-IO whitepaper too:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The key factor driving the SATA Revision 3.0 specification is backward compatibility. While there are advanced technologies available for managing attenuation and jitter, such modifications to a specification can require non-trivial redesign across the development and supply chain – ASICs, PHYs, cabling, connectors, drivers, and applications. &lt;B&gt;By allowing SATA 6Gb/s systems the ability to utilize the same connectors and cables as SATA 3Gb/s systems, most of the modifications required to achieve 6Gb/s are confined to the PHY layer. Except for doubling the data rate, the PHY is no more complex than that defined by the SATA Revision 2.6 specification. &lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;Changes to the protocol itself are minor, and the physical connectors and cables remain unchanged.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's pretty cool that I read specifications, or else I might think there's actually physical differences.  PHY != cabling.  There is an entry in the 2nd whitepaper mentioning cable quality issues, but there is absolutely nothing in the interface connector section stating anything has changed.  Because nothing has.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SATA600, however, does introduce two new connector types for small-form-factor systems or environments: a 7mm connector intended for use with optical drives, a low-insertion force connector intended for 1.8" devices (e.g. SSDs or hard disks).  The connectors are physically slimmer and shorter in depth.  They ARE NOT mandatory; they're 100% optional.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you really don't believe me, you can read the &lt;A href="https://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-6gbs-equipment-design-and-development-finisar.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-6gbs-equipment-design-and-development-finisar.pdf&lt;/A&gt; official SATA600 Design and Development document from SATA-IO, Appendix # 1; read it in full, do not skim.  If you want to talk about SATA300 vs. SATA150, we can talk about that too, and I'd more than happy to point you to the design guide and ECN documents so you can read them yourself.  Again: no differences in cabling required.  It's all the same, nothing has changed.  Regarding EMI/ESD, possibly you're thinking of eSATA connectors, where these things actually matter most?  If so, again: no cabling changes required, however &lt;A href="http://www.serialata.org/documents/esd_control_for_esata_a02-rc-1.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.serialata.org/documents/esd_control_for_esata_a02-rc-1.pdf&lt;/A&gt; SATA300 documenatation from SATA-IO does go over low-level interface specifics.  Once more, this is for eSATA, not internal SATA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-10T07:27:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3799#M3661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In comparing my benchmarks with other I have seen on this forum, I find that my read speeds seem similar to others but my write speeds are lower.  This has been the case since the first benchmark run, right after setting up the new PC, so I'm guessing it's nothing to do with TRIM.  Win 7 64-bit and my driver is msahci.sys, no RAID.  Any thoughts as to why the writes are slower than others have reported?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sally&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3799#M3661</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-26T12:39:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3800#M3662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 80GB SSD has slower Sequential Writes than a 160GB SSD, just keep that in mind when comparing benchmarks. Having said that, your Sequential Write speed is a bit low, should be 80+ MB/s. Try repeating the test and see what happens. Test results do vary, so let's wait for another test and post back what you get.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your other Write speeds look alright, just a tad bit slower than what I get. I have both 80 and 160GB SSD's&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3800#M3662</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T04:38:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3801#M3663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Running again, my Sequential Write Speed has increased slightly - while some other speeds have fallen very slightly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe my SSD is still in training.   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3801#M3663</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T10:40:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3802#M3664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They are faster than mine and my system is fast. I have an AMD 965BE c2, 8 gigs ddr3 ram, MSI 790FX-GD 70 mb with the Intel X25M G2 80gig running my OS -Win7 Pro 64. Your scores are slightly faster. May I suggest that you compare your scores to your old hd and ask is it faster? Wink! What are your computer parts? The scores are very dependant on type of mb, processor etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3802#M3664</guid>
      <dc:creator>SKlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T14:25:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3803#M3665</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, your Sequential Wtite speed still looks lower than what I get for my 80GB SSD:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3803#M3665</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T15:21:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3804#M3666</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I forgot to ask, have you installed the latest firmware update 02HD? Oh, sorry, just looked at your pic and noticed you do have the latest firmware update.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3804#M3666</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T15:22:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3805#M3667</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here you will see the 160GB SSD has better Sequential Write speed than an 80GB SSD (first 80GB then 160GB):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3805#M3667</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T15:27:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3806#M3668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My mb is Asus P7P55D Core i5/i7 carrying 8g DD3 RAM and my processor is Intel Core i7 860 Processor, 2.80GHz Quad Core (overclocked to 3.46GHz for single threaded apps).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm guessing that the driver may also effect the speeds.  I'm using the msachi.sys driver and I believe that I've read that the Intel drivers are faster.  Is this a possible explanation?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3806#M3668</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T15:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3807#M3669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you see the pics I posted above? I am using same driver as you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:38:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3807#M3669</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T15:38:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3808#M3670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oh well.  I guess this is just going to be one of those imponderables.  But thanks for all the feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3808#M3670</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T15:43:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3809#M3671</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is kind of weird, what you get for Sequential Writes. You should have 80+ for sequesntial write speed. Something is not quite right with your setup, but the problem is finding out what it is. What kind of anti-virus and firewall are you using? Are there any "flags" in Device manager? Any issues shown in SMART with SSD Toolbox? I'm just taking shots in the dark here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3809#M3671</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T16:00:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3810#M3672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Antivirus: Microsoft Security Essentials&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Firewall: Internal Windows Firewall is ON.  Only other Firewall is in my router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No flags in Device Manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No issues showing up in SMART or in Diagnostic Scans run in Toolbox.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you think it might be interesting to run Optimizer, even though in theory it isn't necessary as I'm using the M/S driver?  Is it harmful to use Optimizer to TRIM while windows is doing it automatically?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3810#M3672</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T16:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3811#M3673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, running the optimizer shouldn't cause any problem, so give it a try and post back here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3811#M3673</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T18:14:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3812#M3674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have almost the same setup, P7P55D Pro, 8 GB, i7 860, Win7 64-bit, msahci driver, MS Security Essentials.  I was getting the expected performance last time I ran the benchmark.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you installed anything else that may have added a filter driver to the storage stack: encryption, or something else you can think of?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:23:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3812#M3674</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T19:23:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3813#M3675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My PC is new, with a clean Windows 7 install.  The guys who built it ran bench tests before they sent it to me and the same slow write speed showed up in those initial results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I figured it probably wasn't related to needing to be trimmed.  But I've just run the Optimizer and hey, presto!  It sure looks like the slow write speed was a TRIM issue.  Now I'm going to keep an eye on it to see whether Windows will keep it in shape with auto trim as it's meant to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3813#M3675</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T22:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3814#M3676</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looks good! I'm glad you got it working. It is strange you had to run the optimizer, but hey, all is well that ends well. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check it again in about 5-7 days and post the results here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3814#M3676</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T23:11:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3815#M3677</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I forgot to ask, do you have Disk Defragmenter disabled?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3815#M3677</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T23:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3816#M3678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you don't know how to check for Disk Defragmenter, click the Windows icon (first icon on bottom left) and type services local in the Search bar; then click on View local services and scroll to where it says Disk Defragmenter and look to see if it is on Manual, Automatic, or Disabled. If you only use an SSD, then you can set it for Disabled--it should not be running for an SSD.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3816#M3678</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T23:23:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3817#M3679</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have other, non-SSD drives on the system.  One of the first things I did was to check the Disk Defrag Schedule.  My SSD drive is not available for including in scheduled defrags (as Windows recognises that it is an SSD drive).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for all the help.  I'll report back in 7 to 10 days.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3817#M3679</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-27T23:46:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are My Writes Slow?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3818#M3680</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is Superfetch disabled?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/are-my-writes-slow/m-p/3818#M3680</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-28T00:54:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

