<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Diskeeper 2010 - Hyperfast - any further experience with SSDs? in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/diskeeper-2010-hyperfast-any-further-experience-with-ssds/m-p/3795#M3657</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two (data) hard disks in addition to my SSD which I'd like to defrag from time to time.  I'd quite like to use Diskeeper 2010 to do this.  I see that Diskeeper has "Hyperfast" which is aimed at SSDs but this feature has raised mixed views in related threads here.  Particular criticism is found here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;A href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone here had some extended experience with Hyperfast?  Will it damage the SSD?  I am using W7 so assume I have TRIM operating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:14:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T03:14:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Diskeeper 2010 - Hyperfast - any further experience with SSDs?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/diskeeper-2010-hyperfast-any-further-experience-with-ssds/m-p/3795#M3657</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two (data) hard disks in addition to my SSD which I'd like to defrag from time to time.  I'd quite like to use Diskeeper 2010 to do this.  I see that Diskeeper has "Hyperfast" which is aimed at SSDs but this feature has raised mixed views in related threads here.  Particular criticism is found here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;A href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/news/diskeeper-ssd-defrag,6848.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone here had some extended experience with Hyperfast?  Will it damage the SSD?  I am using W7 so assume I have TRIM operating.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:14:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/diskeeper-2010-hyperfast-any-further-experience-with-ssds/m-p/3795#M3657</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-23T03:14:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

