<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Before and after Optimization in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3365#M3227</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm glad It worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your speed is better and with trim it will stay that way, but still a little low, maybe because of sata150 interface, maybe because of laptop bios settings or windows drivers....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only 2 strange things I noticed, your sequencial speed should not have droped and I'm curious about "&lt;B&gt;31K - BAD&lt;/B&gt;" in red, what this means? mine says mshaci and "&lt;B&gt;103424K - OK&lt;/B&gt;" in GREEN text there...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDIT:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After searching for "&lt;B&gt;31K - BAD&lt;/B&gt;" in google (I sugest you do the same using the ""), i've read it's AS SSD that reports &lt;B&gt;your partition is not alligned&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's great that &lt;B&gt;AS SSD now reports partition alignment&lt;/B&gt; in it's last version &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;It also reports if you are using MSAHCI drivers&lt;/B&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This means if you allign your partion, you should get better performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunably this ussualy means repartition, reformating and reinstaling, maybe there's a non destructive way like using partition resizing/moving software... I can't help on this, I never needed to realign...if your up to the trouble make a post asking for help or search google and come back to teach us about it &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've downloaded the last AS SSD version and I got a lower score (even after I runned optimizer twice)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(notice it now reports mshaci and "103424K - OK" aligment GREEN text):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 160 gb drive write speed is faster than the 80 gb and im on sata 300 with msahci and aligned partition.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-29T14:44:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Before and after Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3363#M3225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mr Wolf,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As promised, these are the results:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BEFORE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFTER&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A few observations:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. I have used this drive since Sept 24 (about 3 months) and it's 39gb free/out of 80 gb, but it took only 2 seconds to optimize. Is this normal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. After optimization, all figures improved except the Seq write speed, which dropped to 59.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. 4k-6kthrd write improved 2x!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are these results expected?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3363#M3225</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-29T07:56:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Before and after Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3364#M3226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Again, my heart-felt thanks to Mr Wolf. Without your help, I would not be able to update FW or install the Toolbox.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3364#M3226</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-29T07:58:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Before and after Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3365#M3227</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm glad It worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your speed is better and with trim it will stay that way, but still a little low, maybe because of sata150 interface, maybe because of laptop bios settings or windows drivers....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only 2 strange things I noticed, your sequencial speed should not have droped and I'm curious about "&lt;B&gt;31K - BAD&lt;/B&gt;" in red, what this means? mine says mshaci and "&lt;B&gt;103424K - OK&lt;/B&gt;" in GREEN text there...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EDIT:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After searching for "&lt;B&gt;31K - BAD&lt;/B&gt;" in google (I sugest you do the same using the ""), i've read it's AS SSD that reports &lt;B&gt;your partition is not alligned&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's great that &lt;B&gt;AS SSD now reports partition alignment&lt;/B&gt; in it's last version &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;It also reports if you are using MSAHCI drivers&lt;/B&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This means if you allign your partion, you should get better performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunably this ussualy means repartition, reformating and reinstaling, maybe there's a non destructive way like using partition resizing/moving software... I can't help on this, I never needed to realign...if your up to the trouble make a post asking for help or search google and come back to teach us about it &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've downloaded the last AS SSD version and I got a lower score (even after I runned optimizer twice)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(notice it now reports mshaci and "103424K - OK" aligment GREEN text):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 160 gb drive write speed is faster than the 80 gb and im on sata 300 with msahci and aligned partition.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3365#M3227</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-29T14:44:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Before and after Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3366#M3228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After moving 20 GB of data to my 2nd HD and running optimizer I got back the performance I had:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I have 90 GB free space, I dont know why optimizer didnt do its jod with 70 GB free space (see previous post)...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3366#M3228</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-29T16:13:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Before and after Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3367#M3229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good morning Mr Wolf,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I heard about alignment, which sounds like a major engineering work to me, haha! For the time being, I will put up with the slower speed, until some easy way to align the disk is found or worry about it when I get myself a new notebook.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you all the same for the very useful tips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers! &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:18:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/before-and-after-optimization/m-p/3367#M3229</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-30T02:18:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

