<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: X25-m 320GB availablity / projected RRP in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2983#M2845</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's true that TRIM probably won't work, but you will get huge performance boost from RAID in all areas - random and sequential writes and reads (500MB+ read must be nice) whereas TRIM only helps to maintain write speeds over long period of time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can already do what TRIM does on RAID by running Intel Toolkit optimisations and restoring RAID array and better tools are already being developed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also remember that TRIM only works in Win7 and only helps with write performance after a while, so in some way it's probably better no to rely on TRIM so much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any case, if you do decide to build any RAID-0 array - ensure that you have a solid backup for the data that you care about RAID-0 is easy to break, but with 2 x 160GB SSD and the fact that you should leave ca 20% free space for optimum performance, you probably only need 250GB HDD for backup - perhaps you can reuse your existing one for that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-21T14:05:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X25-m 320GB availablity / projected RRP</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2980#M2842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any idea when the 320GB version will be released and has anyone speculated an RRP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was going to get a 160GB but if the price is right ill opt for a 320 instead?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2980#M2842</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-17T20:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25-m 320GB availablity / projected RRP</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2981#M2843</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It has not been announced yet, so I wouldn't hold my breath for it. Intel has quite recently updated their SSD lineup with 34nm process, so it could be a while until new products are announced, especially since there are no better SSD drives now, only cheaper ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fact that even Intel's enterprise lineup doesn't have a 320GB model is no coincidence - SSDs are expensive and usually only the most frequently used data - OS, Applications etc can justify the high cost of SSD.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you really need that much storage - I suggest getting a secondary traditional drive - I run a laptop like that with a 2nd HDD instead of the now useless DVD Drive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you really want all of 320GB of super-fast and super-expensive storage, just get two 160GB drives, especially if it's not for a laptop. YOu can put it in a RAID-0 to almost double the performance in some cases.     &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2981#M2843</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-20T01:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25-m 320GB availablity / projected RRP</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2982#M2844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, i thought Trim wasnt supported on 2x SSD's when raided. or does it work when you upgrade the firmware on each drive seperately and then raid them&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2982#M2844</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-21T00:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X25-m 320GB availablity / projected RRP</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2983#M2845</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's true that TRIM probably won't work, but you will get huge performance boost from RAID in all areas - random and sequential writes and reads (500MB+ read must be nice) whereas TRIM only helps to maintain write speeds over long period of time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can already do what TRIM does on RAID by running Intel Toolkit optimisations and restoring RAID array and better tools are already being developed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also remember that TRIM only works in Win7 and only helps with write performance after a while, so in some way it's probably better no to rely on TRIM so much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any case, if you do decide to build any RAID-0 array - ensure that you have a solid backup for the data that you care about RAID-0 is easy to break, but with 2 x 160GB SSD and the fact that you should leave ca 20% free space for optimum performance, you probably only need 250GB HDD for backup - perhaps you can reuse your existing one for that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:05:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/x25-m-320gb-availablity-projected-rrp/m-p/2983#M2845</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-21T14:05:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

