<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel SSD results for HD Tune 2.55 resultspre and post firmware update in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/intel-ssd-results-for-hd-tune-2-55-resultspre-and-post-firmware/m-p/2717#M2579</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ran HD tune 2.55 when I first got the drive and the firmware had just been pulled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new firmware was release updated np - installed AHCI Ran optimmer then ran HD Tune 2.55 transfer rates was up but whats happen to burst rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would anyone else care to post there results, or explan whats going on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zeus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-03T21:09:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel SSD results for HD Tune 2.55 resultspre and post firmware update</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/intel-ssd-results-for-hd-tune-2-55-resultspre-and-post-firmware/m-p/2717#M2579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ran HD tune 2.55 when I first got the drive and the firmware had just been pulled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new firmware was release updated np - installed AHCI Ran optimmer then ran HD Tune 2.55 transfer rates was up but whats happen to burst rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would anyone else care to post there results, or explan whats going on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zeus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/intel-ssd-results-for-hd-tune-2-55-resultspre-and-post-firmware/m-p/2717#M2579</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-03T21:09:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel SSD results for HD Tune 2.55 resultspre and post firmware update</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/intel-ssd-results-for-hd-tune-2-55-resultspre-and-post-firmware/m-p/2718#M2580</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't have pre-results to show, but here are my post 02HDs.  Maybe just run the bench again - could have had some traffic on the bus or memory tied up elsewhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The really good thing to note below is the -1% CPU utilization.  So if I have 100 instances of HD Tune running I can effectively turn my quad core into an oct core.  Awesome!  Best part is, this comes with no additional energy cost - I'm going to apply for some Obama green tech grants to pursue putting HD Tune on everything!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/intel-ssd-results-for-hd-tune-2-55-resultspre-and-post-firmware/m-p/2718#M2580</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-03T22:12:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

