<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why are my 330 Series 240 GB SSD benchmarks so low? in Archive</title>
    <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19632#M11659</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;MacMini i5 2.5Ghz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16 GB Ram&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Windows 7 Ultimate (Using Bootcamp)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;330 240 GB SSD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Solid State Drive Toolbox 3.0.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mac OS X 10.7.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Background:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Bootcamp doesn't natively support AHCI so using IDE mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Toolbox lists this drive model as "Unknown"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Fresh Install of all Operating Systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I setup various tests using IO meter, XBENCH, and Crystal Disk Mark and do not get anywhere close to the specs listed by Intel. For IO meter, I performed three tests using 1GB, 8GB, and 24GB test files with Queue Depths of 32. I used the same benchmark parameters as listed in the specs: 4KB Sequential Reads/Writes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below are screenshots of the results of the tests that I performed. I am assuming that the IDE mode is one issue however, if that were the case, it seems that I should have gotten outstanding results with XBENCH on the Mac OS X partition. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1GB Sequential Read: 20,685 IO and 80.80 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1GB Sequential Write: 29,686 IO and 116 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8GB Sequential Read: 18,929 IO and 74 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8GB Sequential Write: 29,644 IO and 116 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24GB Sequential Read: 14,464 IO and 57 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24GB Sequential Write: 29,688 IO and 116 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;XBENCH Result in Mac OS X 10.7.4: Sequential READ = 32 MB/s and Sequential WRITE = 297 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Crystal Disk Mark in Win 7 Partition&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:50:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-17T07:50:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why are my 330 Series 240 GB SSD benchmarks so low?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19632#M11659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MacMini i5 2.5Ghz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;16 GB Ram&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Windows 7 Ultimate (Using Bootcamp)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;330 240 GB SSD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Solid State Drive Toolbox 3.0.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mac OS X 10.7.4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Background:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Bootcamp doesn't natively support AHCI so using IDE mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The Toolbox lists this drive model as "Unknown"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Fresh Install of all Operating Systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I setup various tests using IO meter, XBENCH, and Crystal Disk Mark and do not get anywhere close to the specs listed by Intel. For IO meter, I performed three tests using 1GB, 8GB, and 24GB test files with Queue Depths of 32. I used the same benchmark parameters as listed in the specs: 4KB Sequential Reads/Writes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below are screenshots of the results of the tests that I performed. I am assuming that the IDE mode is one issue however, if that were the case, it seems that I should have gotten outstanding results with XBENCH on the Mac OS X partition. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1GB Sequential Read: 20,685 IO and 80.80 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1GB Sequential Write: 29,686 IO and 116 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8GB Sequential Read: 18,929 IO and 74 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;8GB Sequential Write: 29,644 IO and 116 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24GB Sequential Read: 14,464 IO and 57 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;24GB Sequential Write: 29,688 IO and 116 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;XBENCH Result in Mac OS X 10.7.4: Sequential READ = 32 MB/s and Sequential WRITE = 297 MB/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Crystal Disk Mark in Win 7 Partition&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:50:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19632#M11659</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-17T07:50:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why are my 330 Series 240 GB SSD benchmarks so low?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19633#M11660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;AHCI mode makes a huge difference, you're fortunate to get what you have now without it. The 4K scores are very dependent on AHCI mode, particularly in benchmarks. I don't understand why one benchmark would be better in IDE mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks like you are barely in SATA III performance territory, if at all. Does that PC support SATA III?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:43:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19633#M11660</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-18T17:43:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why are my 330 Series 240 GB SSD benchmarks so low?</title>
      <link>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19634#M11661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;parsec - thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is unfortunate - I guess I should have done my homework a bit more. The 2011 MacMini does support SATA III but mine shipped with a SATA II 5400 Drive. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even in IDE mode, the performance is without a doubt much better but I had hoped to run VMware Workstation on the Windows side with a VSA (Virtual Storage Appliance) and nested ESXi's for testing and studying. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll test around on the Mac OS X side and see if I can my hands on a more reliable disk bench marking tool and post my results. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.solidigm.com/t5/archive/why-are-my-330-series-240-gb-ssd-benchmarks-so-low/m-p/19634#M11661</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-18T23:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

